This is in answer to
prisoner23's story about his friend Dave and his frustration in achieving his dreams.
At the very root of Dave's problem lies Dave's lack of understanding of the meaning of the word freedom. There is a problem when people have different and conflicting views on what free or freedom is. Your's and Dave's very use of the word freedom demonstrates in itself why Dave failed.
To draw from the discussions and philosophies of the free software community, and what Richard Stallman, founder of the GNU Project and the free software foundation, believes is the essence of free software
- The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
- The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1).
- Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
- The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbour (freedom 2).
- The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
Richard Stallman believes that Free software is a matter of liberty, not price. And that you should think of free as in free speech, not as in free beer. Whereas others will believe that freedom is having free will to decide whether or not to buy and drink the beer.
You cannot buy beer from a large multi-nation brewery and expect to receive a copy of their recipe and brew your own beer of your own improved recipe, which is what Richard Stallmans and the GNU Project believes is freedom.
In stark contrast to Richard Stallmans view on freedom, Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft, has in the past publicly attacked this very requirement to give freedom to your customers by saying that it is a cancer destroying the intellectual property value of everything it touches.
So in essence the only freedom you received from the brewery (and Microsoft) was the freedom of choice. The freedom to choose whether or not to buy and drink their beer (or software), a freedom which is often hampered by lack of choice due to monopoly. Most people are perfectly happy with this very minimal freedom and will not complain because they don't realize they lack the choice as it doesn't yet exist.
And even if the brewery did provide you with their recipe to brew and improve to make your own beer, the question is, should you be free to withhold the recipe from your buyers? Or should you be forced to include a full recipe with every can of beer sold?
So essentially true freedom can never be attained because it does not exist, there are only different views on what freedom is.
And as a result, Dave never realized that the the freedom to withdraw from society and to not pay taxes was never given to him in the first place. He failed to communicate his view on freedom to the people around him. The society Dave lived in had a very different view of freedom from what Dave thought of as freedom, so Dave's dream failed and Dave became very frustrated with his inability to achieve his dream in the society he lived in and ended up as failure. A frustrated, lost and broken man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_%28
philosophy%29
What Dave probably should have done is to either work on his communication skills or find a place where his views on freedom and his need for self-sufficiency is shared by the society around him. Poor people in small communities in developing countries would probably have been a good choice where he could even have attained success and high stature in the community if he had been accepted into their community.
Or, if those two options do not suite Dave, he probably should have tried very hard to go somewhere where no one else lives and no one desires to live, perhaps a remote island, a desert, the moon, or even Mars or Venus.
Also, it is worth considering why Dave's lack of understanding and his inability to communicate his needs to the society around him, perhaps, as mentioned in another article on your blog, he is just an ill-educated slave of society struck by pure luck on the lottery. Not educated enough to articulate himself and understand the people around him, his attempts were bound to fail.
Or perhaps he could be a successful person who has not realized that he is suffering from an undiagnosed Attentive Hyperactive Disability Disorder, ADHD. He is frustrated by his inability to communicate and function in society as well as society's failure to identify his disorder and is thereby lost and broken. This is a disorder which it is estimated that 10% of the male population and 4% of the female population have.
To quote an article:
Although individuals with [AD/HD] can be very successful in life, without identification and proper treatment, AD/HD may have serious consequences, including school failure, family stress and disruption, depression, problems with relationships, substance abuse, delinquency, risk for accidental injuries and job failure. Early identification and treatment are extremely important.
The symptoms are:
AD/HD predominantly inattentive type: (AD/HD-I)
- Fails to give close attention to details or makes careless mistakes.
- Has difficulty sustaining attention.
- Does not appear to listen.
- Struggles to follow through on instructions.
- Has difficulty with organization.
- Avoids or dislikes tasks requiring sustained mental effort.
- Loses things.
- Is easily distracted.
- Is forgetful in daily activities.
AD/HD predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type: (AD/HD-HI)
- Fidgets with hands or feet or squirms in chair.
- Has difficulty remaining seated.
- Runs about or climbs excessively.
- Difficulty engaging in activities quietly.
- Acts as if driven by a motor.
- Talks excessively.
- Blurts out answers before questions have been completed.
- Difficulty waiting or taking turns.
- Interrupts or intrudes upon others.
If any of these feel familiar i would strongly urge you to continue your reading through the links provided below regarding AD/HD.
PS. I would like to apologize if i crossed a line when criticizing Dave who is most likely a real person or based on one. Communicating criticism in a way that is well received is extremely hard and requires deep knowledge of the person in question which it is not possible to gain over the Internet.
See also:
The definition of freedom
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_%28philosophy%29Richard Stallmans and the GNU Project's freedom.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.htmlThe conflicting views of free as in beer vs free as in speech
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gratis_versus_Libre Ballmer Calls Linux "A Cancer"
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/01/1658258Beer which you are free to brew and improve:
http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,68144,00.htmlInformation about AD/HD
http://www.help4adhd.org/en/about/what/WWK1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADHDhttp://www.google.co.uk/search?q=adhd